The real pisser is Dan's question, to a bot of all things:

"And how many posts per day do you make?"

The question was posed in amongst no less than 13 of his posts alleging, as
always, "You're still erroneously presupposing that I am erroneously
presupposing."

It seems they have nothing to discuss in comp.os.os2.advocacy and merely go
around in endless loops, emulating seals missing a flipper whilst deceiving
themselves into believing they're swimming in a straight line. No doubt the
condition was brought on by the death of OS/2, and no doubt the same fate
awaits comp.os.linux.advocacy.


From: "Dan" <me@here.net>
Subject: Re: The TholenBot Chronicles
Date: Saturday, 14 February 2004 12:10 AM

In article <Tm0Xb.2173$_g.1991@twister.socal.rr.com>,
[email]tholen@antispam.ham[/email] wrote:

>I was wondering how long it would take before Dan's emotional need to
>antagonize someone become so strong that he would desperately expand to
>several postings each day. Today it finally happened, so it's time to
>switch to digest mode.

And how many posts per day do you make?

You're still erroneously presupposing that I am erroneously
presupposing. Rather ironic, coming from someone who has reposted the
same old unsubstantiated and erroneous claim multiple times.

Classic TholenBot response, laced with paranoia, as expected from a
robot with no logical thought process.

You're still erroneously presupposing that I am erroneously
presupposing. Rather ironic, coming from someone who has reposted the
same old unsubstantiated and erroneous claim multiple times.

Classic TholenBot response, laced with paranoia, as expected from a
robot with no logical thought process.

You're still erroneously presupposing that I am erroneously
presupposing. Rather ironic, coming from someone who has reposted the
same old unsubstantiated and erroneous claim multiple times.

Classic TholenBot response, laced with paranoia, as expected from a
robot with no logical thought process.

You're still erroneously presupposing that I am erroneously
presupposing. Rather ironic, coming from someone who has reposted the
same old unsubstantiated and erroneous claim multiple times.

Classic TholenBot response, laced with paranoia, as expected from a
robot with no logical thought process.

Dan




From: "Edwin" <thorne25@juno.com>
Subject: Re: How sweet it is...
Date: Saturday, 14 February 2004 6:03 AM

"Dan" <me@here.net> wrote in message
news:me-D5E23B.07563413022004@28-74.newscene.com...
> In article <N41Xb.2177$_g.948@twister.socal.rr.com>,
> [email]tholen@antispam.ham[/email] wrote:
>
> >Non sequitur.
>
> Classic TholenBot response, laced with paranoia, as expected from a
> robot with no logical thought process.

Typical erroneous and unsubstantiated claim. Meanwhile, where is your
logical argument? Why, nowhere to be seen!

Edwin


--
Your Free Insult: Thou spitting, procrastinating, fogyish bunghole decrying hog badger.

Kadaitcha Man writes:

> The real pisser is Dan's question, to a bot of all things:

You're erroneously presupposing that Dan posed a question to a "bot",
Kadaitcha.

> "And how many posts per day do you make?"

I'm well aware of Dan's question, Kadaitcha.

"Why do you feel the need to restate it?"
--Conus Betulinus Zulu Kadaitcha

> The question was posed in amongst no less than 13 of his posts

Many worded identically, Kadaitcha. Does that constitute a "bot" to
you, Kadaitcha?

> alleging, as always, "You're still erroneously presupposing that I am
> erroneously presupposing."

On the contrary, it's not merely an allegation, Kadaitcha, but rather
the truth that Dan is erroneously presupposing.

> It seems they have nothing to discuss in comp.os.os2.advocacy and merely go
> around in endless loops, emulating seals missing a flipper whilst deceiving
> themselves into believing they're swimming in a straight line.

What seems to you is irrelevant, Kadaitcha.

> No doubt the
> condition was brought on by the death of OS/2, and no doubt the same fate
> awaits comp.os.linux.advocacy.

You're erroneously presupposing that OS/2 is dead, Kadaitcha.

Kadaitcha Man wrote:

>
> It seems they have nothing to discuss in comp.os.os2.advocacy and merely
> go around in endless loops, emulating seals missing a flipper whilst
> deceiving themselves into believing they're swimming in a straight line.
> No doubt the condition was brought on by the death of OS/2, and no doubt

But if this NG gets moderated and all the win****s, such as yourself, are
cleared out, it would increase the meaningful value of Usenet. Nobody needs
the useless garbage that dribbles out of your foul mouth any more than the
dialog you quote. The conclusion is that Nazi-white-trash folk aren't any
more interesting.

--

A fatal exception 0E has occurred at 0028:C000BD1D in VXD VMM(01) +
0000AD1D. The current application will be terminated.

Dr alw wrote:

> win****s

> Nobody needs the useless garbage that dribbles out of your foul mouth
> any more than the dialog you quote.

Oh, the irony.


--
Your Free Insult: Thou pruning, acquainting, two-party picolo player vying idiot.

On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:16:11 GMT, [email]tholen@antispam.ham[/email] wrote:

> Kadaitcha Man writes:
>
>> The real pisser is Dan's question, to a bot of all things:
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that Dan posed a question to a
> "bot", Kadaitcha.
>
>> "And how many posts per day do you make?"
>
> I'm well aware of Dan's question, Kadaitcha.
>
> "Why do you feel the need to restate it?" --Conus Betulinus Zulu
> Kadaitcha
>
>> The question was posed in amongst no less than 13 of his posts
>
> Many worded identically, Kadaitcha. Does that constitute a "bot"
> to you, Kadaitcha?
>
>> alleging, as always, "You're still erroneously presupposing that I
>> am erroneously presupposing."
>
> On the contrary, it's not merely an allegation, Kadaitcha, but
> rather the truth that Dan is erroneously presupposing.
>
>> It seems they have nothing to discuss in comp.os.os2.advocacy and
>> merely go around in endless loops, emulating seals missing a
>> flipper whilst deceiving themselves into believing they're
>> swimming in a straight line.
>
> What seems to you is irrelevant, Kadaitcha.
>
>> No doubt the condition was brought on by the death of OS/2, and no
>> doubt the same fate awaits comp.os.linux.advocacy.
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that OS/2 is dead, Kadaitcha.

Do you have any classical music to discuss, antagonizer?
--
PJR :-)

(Remove NOSPAM to reply)

In article <KzLOkw419SKu6FA265CEcUjGQNh9HrxG@[url]www.acmeweb.co.uk[/url]>,
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@rainx.cjb.net> wrote:
>The real pisser is Dan's question, to a bot of all things:

You're erroneously presupposing that Tholen is a bot, Kadaitcha.

I could presuppose that Dave's reply to this post will be

"What has that to do with OS/2, Hills?"

.... but that would be an erroneous presupposition.

--
Don Hills (dmhills at attglobaldotnet) Wellington, New Zealand

Don Hills wrote:
> In article <KzLOkw419SKu6FA265CEcUjGQNh9HrxG@[url]www.acmeweb.co.uk[/url]>,
> "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@rainx.cjb.net> wrote:
>> The real pisser is Dan's question, to a bot of all things:
>
> You're erroneously presupposing

*plonk*


--
Your Free Insult: Thou trifallowing, blindfolding, manic-depressive middle manager bargaining duodenum.

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@rainx.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:KzLOkw419SKu6FA265CEcUjGQNh9HrxG@[url]www.acmeweb.co.uk...[/url]

This guy is boring

Stan wrote:
> "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@rainx.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:KzLOkw419SKu6FA265CEcUjGQNh9HrxG@[url]www.acmeweb.co.uk...[/url]
>
> This guy is boring

Woah, steady now.. Dont want to start an international war with words as
strong as that...!


--
Declan Swan

You can't be truly rude until you understand good manners.
Your free insult:
Thou becoming, musing, lustreless ape crotch discarded flap-dragon

Declan Swan wrote:

> Stan wrote:
>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@rainx.cjb.net> wrote in message
>> news:KzLOkw419SKu6FA265CEcUjGQNh9HrxG@[url]www.acmeweb.co.uk...[/url]
>>
>> This guy is boring
>
> Woah, steady now.. Dont want to start an international war with words as
> strong as that...!
>
>
fuk u
--
Kent Crazy B.V.

Peter J Ross writes:

>> Kadaitcha Man writes:

>>> The real pisser is Dan's question, to a bot of all things:

>> You're erroneously presupposing that Dan posed a question to a
>> "bot", Kadaitcha.

>>> "And how many posts per day do you make?"

>> I'm well aware of Dan's question, Kadaitcha.

>> "Why do you feel the need to restate it?" --Conus Betulinus Zulu
>> Kadaitcha

>>> The question was posed in amongst no less than 13 of his posts

>> Many worded identically, Kadaitcha. Does that constitute a "bot"
>> to you, Kadaitcha?

>>> alleging, as always, "You're still erroneously presupposing that I
>>> am erroneously presupposing."

>> On the contrary, it's not merely an allegation, Kadaitcha, but
>> rather the truth that Dan is erroneously presupposing.

>>> It seems they have nothing to discuss in comp.os.os2.advocacy and
>>> merely go around in endless loops, emulating seals missing a
>>> flipper whilst deceiving themselves into believing they're
>>> swimming in a straight line.

>> What seems to you is irrelevant, Kadaitcha.

>>> No doubt the condition was brought on by the death of OS/2, and no
>>> doubt the same fate awaits comp.os.linux.advocacy.

>> You're erroneously presupposing that OS/2 is dead, Kadaitcha.

> Do you have any classical music to discuss,

Why should I (or anyone) discuss classical music in an OS/2 newsgroup,
Ross? Classic illogic.

> antagonizer?

You're erroneously presupposing that I'm an antagonizer, Ross. Rather
ironic, coming from the person who just asked an antagonistic question.

Don Hills writes:

> Kadaitcha Man wrote:

>> The real pisser is Dan's question, to a bot of all things:

> You're erroneously presupposing that Tholen is a bot, Kadaitcha.

Very good, Hills, but what does that have to do with OS/2?

> I could presuppose that Dave's reply to this post will be
>
> "What has that to do with OS/2, Hills?"
>
> .... but that would be an erroneous presupposition.

Erroneous.

"Declan Swan" <usenet@simbiant.net> wrote in message
news:6caqb1ogjmsvc2c.140220040854@127.0.0.1...
> Stan wrote:
> > "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@rainx.cjb.net> wrote in message
> > news:KzLOkw419SKu6FA265CEcUjGQNh9HrxG@[url]www.acmeweb.co.uk...[/url]
> >
> > This guy is boring
>
> Woah, steady now.. Dont want to start an international war with words as
> strong as that...!
>
>
and why not?

On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:28:07 GMT, [email]tholen@antispam.ham[/email] wrote:

> Peter J Ross writes:
>
>>> Kadaitcha Man writes:
>
>
>>>> The real pisser is Dan's question, to a bot of all things:
>
>
>>> You're erroneously presupposing that Dan posed a question to a
>>> "bot", Kadaitcha.
>
>
>>>> "And how many posts per day do you make?"
>
>
>>> I'm well aware of Dan's question, Kadaitcha.
>
>
>>> "Why do you feel the need to restate it?" --Conus Betulinus Zulu
>>> Kadaitcha
>
>
>>>> The question was posed in amongst no less than 13 of his posts
>
>
>>> Many worded identically, Kadaitcha. Does that constitute a "bot"
>>> to you, Kadaitcha?
>
>
>>>> alleging, as always, "You're still erroneously presupposing that
>>>> I am erroneously presupposing."
>
>
>>> On the contrary, it's not merely an allegation, Kadaitcha, but
>>> rather the truth that Dan is erroneously presupposing.
>
>
>>>> It seems they have nothing to discuss in comp.os.os2.advocacy and
>>>> merely go around in endless loops, emulating seals missing a
>>>> flipper whilst deceiving themselves into believing they're
>>>> swimming in a straight line.
>
>
>>> What seems to you is irrelevant, Kadaitcha.
>
>
>>>> No doubt the condition was brought on by the death of OS/2, and
>>>> no doubt the same fate awaits comp.os.linux.advocacy.
>
>
>>> You're erroneously presupposing that OS/2 is dead, Kadaitcha.
>
>
>> Do you have any classical music to discuss,
>
> Why should I (or anyone) discuss classical music in an OS/2
> newsgroup, Ross? Classic illogic.

You are erroneously presupposing that logic is on-topic in
alt.config, Tholen.

>> antagonizer?
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that I'm an antagonizer, Ross.
> Rather ironic, coming from the person who just asked an
> antagonistic question.

What does your post have to do with OS/2, Tholen?
--
PJR :-)

(Remove NOSPAM to reply)

Peter J Ross writes:

>>>> Kadaitcha Man writes:

>>>>> The real pisser is Dan's question, to a bot of all things:

>>>> You're erroneously presupposing that Dan posed a question to a
>>>> "bot", Kadaitcha.

>>>>> "And how many posts per day do you make?"

>>>> I'm well aware of Dan's question, Kadaitcha.

>>>> "Why do you feel the need to restate it?" --Conus Betulinus Zulu
>>>> Kadaitcha

>>>>> The question was posed in amongst no less than 13 of his posts

>>>> Many worded identically, Kadaitcha. Does that constitute a "bot"
>>>> to you, Kadaitcha?

>>>>> alleging, as always, "You're still erroneously presupposing that
>>>>> I am erroneously presupposing."

>>>> On the contrary, it's not merely an allegation, Kadaitcha, but
>>>> rather the truth that Dan is erroneously presupposing.

>>>>> It seems they have nothing to discuss in comp.os.os2.advocacy and
>>>>> merely go around in endless loops, emulating seals missing a
>>>>> flipper whilst deceiving themselves into believing they're
>>>>> swimming in a straight line.

>>>> What seems to you is irrelevant, Kadaitcha.

>>>>> No doubt the condition was brought on by the death of OS/2, and
>>>>> no doubt the same fate awaits comp.os.linux.advocacy.

>>>> You're erroneously presupposing that OS/2 is dead, Kadaitcha.

>>> Do you have any classical music to discuss,

>> Why should I (or anyone) discuss classical music in an OS/2
>> newsgroup, Ross? Classic illogic.

> You are erroneously presupposing that logic is on-topic in
> alt.config, Tholen.

Non sequitur, but go ahead and do whatever configurations you need to
do in an illogical fashion, Ross. Meanwhile, I see that you didn't
answer my question, choosing instead to evade it with a non sequitur.

>>> antagonizer?

>> You're erroneously presupposing that I'm an antagonizer, Ross.
>> Rather ironic, coming from the person who just asked an
>> antagonistic question.

> What does your post have to do with OS/2, Tholen?

Why are you asking about OS/2 this time but classical music previously,
Ross? Same newsgroups, none of which involve classical music. Classic
inconsistency.