Talk Root - PC Hardware, Software and Web Development forums

Go Back   Talk Root - PC Hardware, Software and Web Development forums > Operating Systems > Windows Discussion > Windows XP


Welcome to the Talk Root - PC Hardware, Software and Web Development forums. Are you a programmer, web developer, IT guy or a computer guru? We invite you to join our forums and participate in friendly discussion. It doesn't matter your skill level, we are here to help everyone.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Sponsored Links
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 01-31-2004, 08:35 AM   #1
Dr. Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Caldera contributed ABI files to Linux

Kadaitcha Man wrote:
> paul cooke wrote:
>> Linønut wrote:
>>
>>
>>> While this may be true for other UNIX shared libraries, SCO did in
>>> fact provide some Unix shared libraries, as products for Linux,
>>> under the
>>> GPL. The evidence shows that SCO packaged and provided a set of Unix
>>> shared libraries, with a System V ABI, as a GPLed product, to Linux
>>> users.

>>
>>
>> so now their case should self implode because of the logical
>> inconsistencies in it???
>>
>> When this analysis gets out into the mainstream financial "press",
>> their stock price should fall through the floor... Things should be
>> quite hectic when trading starts on Monday morning then...

>
> What a load of ****. If any of you ****wit ****s bothered to try to
> understand the SCO position, (ya, anathema to you, I know, but ****,
> at
> least its an original thought) they are saying that the person or
> persons who released the code did not have authority to do so. Why the
> **** don't you ****s get it right? Don't answer that, you're all too
> ****ing stupid.
>
> The fact remains, it is now for the courts to decide if SCO's claim
> has
> or does not have merit, and your (collective) harping on about it will
> not change a ****ing thing.
>
> You bunch of dumb****, infected ****bubbles.
>
> --
> Kadaitcha Man: Registered Linux User #344402
> Akhenaten: Registered Linux Machine #235500

~~~~~~~~~

Nice name!: http://www.heptune.com/Akhen1.jpg


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Sponsors
Banner Best Deals 24x7 @ Geeks.com!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=
© 2006 TalkRoot.com -