Talk Root - PC Hardware, Software and Web Development forums

Go Back   Talk Root - PC Hardware, Software and Web Development forums > System Administration > Mail Servers > Sendmail


Welcome to the Talk Root - PC Hardware, Software and Web Development forums. Are you a programmer, web developer, IT guy or a computer guru? We invite you to join our forums and participate in friendly discussion. It doesn't matter your skill level, we are here to help everyone.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Sponsored Links
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 01-13-2004, 03:08 PM   #1
Rusty Nejdl
 
Posts: n/a
Why did sendmail allow this message in?

In my /etc/mail/access file, I have:

ded.swbell.net REJECT

and today, I received this spam message:

Return-Path: <meggoiwan_ik4561@check1check.com>
Received: from 65-70-26-18.ded.swbell.net (65-70-26-18.ded.swbell.net
[65.70.26.18] (may be forged))
by tethys.ringofsaturn.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id
i0DLtGav090378
for <WEBMASTER@SATURNCONSULTING.COM>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:55:17
-0600 (CST)
(envelope-from meggoiwan_ik4561@check1check.com)
Received: from [178.30.179.204] by 65-70-26-18.ded.swbell.net with
ESMTP id C19AC7BF8FC; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 10:56:27 +0000
Message-ID: <r$-1-5$-955$l4219@u4t0gr2us>
From: "Robyn Miller" <meggoiwan_ik4561@check1check.com>
Reply-To: "Robyn Miller" <meggoiwan_ik4561@check1check.com>
To: WEBMASTER@SATURNCONSULTING.COM
Subject: Code #674
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 04 10:56:27 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="9BD9CF_1730B..2"
X-Priority: 1
X-MSMail-Priority: High

which very much resolves correctly:

[tethys]:[4:07pm]:[/etc/mail] > host 65.70.26.18
18.26.70.65.IN-ADDR.ARPA domain name pointer
65-70-26-18.ded.swbell.net
[tethys]:[4:07pm]:[/etc/mail] >

So, why did sendmail allow this?


Also, another question I have is how to get sendmail to completely
ignore the HELO/EHLO line of what the server identifies itself as
because I just want to check the DNS of the host?

Thanks!
Rusty Nejdl
Hostmaster, Ring of Saturn
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-14-2004, 11:36 PM   #2
D. Stussy
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Why did sendmail allow this message in?


On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Rusty Nejdl wrote:
> [Access DB question deleted] ...
>
> Also, another question I have is how to get sendmail to completely
> ignore the HELO/EHLO line of what the server identifies itself as
> because I just want to check the DNS of the host?


Except for the received line issue (already mentioned in another response),
there should be nothing in the default configuration that is checking the domain
given on the EHLO/HELO introduction. The RFC's say that this information isn't
really supposed to be checked. There is one case where I will differ with the
RFC's: If a host not you (per its IP address from the TCP connection) says that
it is you. To check further will break another possible case: A multi-homed
server, which is always supposed to give its PRIMARY name on the HELO line, but
may have interfaces lying in different domains from that domain of its primary
hostname. With the multihomed MTA server, the IP lookup and that interface's
domain name may be consistent but not be the same as the HELO name.

I have heard that there are some e-mail clients (or servers acting as relays)
that give the destination hostname in their HELO lines instead of their own
identity. The authors of those packages should be drawn and quartered. IT's
not supposed to be "Hello <your name>" but "Hello, I am <my name>." Grrrrrr.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Sponsors
Banner Best Deals 24x7 @ Geeks.com!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=
© 2006 TalkRoot.com -