| Re: How to change color depth on Ultra 60? Robin KAY wrote: > Brandon Hoppe wrote: >> Dangit, sorry guys, forgot to mention that I don't have root access. > Then you need to ask the sysadmin to change it for you. OK, I do not dispute that this is factual, but doesn't it seem kind of, well, dumb? I can understand if root access is needed to change to a screen mode that isn't on a list of approved ones. Changing to some untested mode could potentially compromise the stability of the system (or at least access to it given whatever monitor is hooked up). And I can see sometimes requiring the admin to tweak a file that contains a list of supported modes, maybe adding an obscure one that is not commonly used. But basically, the system should come with a list of supported modes and there should be an easy way of changing them without requiring root access. Preferably without restarting the X server either, although I know that's hard. But at least it should only require logging out and in again, not calling up the system administrator and waiting however long it takes to get a call back. Of course, it should require console ownership for a regular user to change the screen mode. And the system should remember the default state and set it back to that state when someone logs out. But by gosh, it should at least be possible to do it when it's reasonable. Right now, the situation is such that this is a giant, giant pain on Solaris. But on Windows, it only takes a right click on the background and a little bit of navigation through obscure menus to do it. And on the Mac it's even easier. And on every other computer, it's also really really easy. But it's a pain on Solaris. In the days where multisync monitors were a big luxury and video modes had to be hand-tuned to avoid smoking your monitor, that made sense, but it's not 1989 anymore. By the way, I'm not trying to trash Solaris. I've been using Sun machines and software for 15 years. I like it. But when you get into an area that's so behind the times as this one, it's just a little disappointing. (Not that Linux is a huge amount better. On Linux, you have to ALSO go through the step of concocting a workable XF86Config file, a process which is just plain moronic IMHO.) - Logan |