Ignoramus20562

In article <opr5fhnjborjctj4@news.snet.sbcglobal.net>, Bob in CT wrote:
> On 25 Mar 2004 17:25:19 GMT, Ignoramus20562
><ignoramus20562@NOSPAM.20562.invalid> wrote:
> [cut]
>>>
>>
>> fruits are always restricted because they contain a lot of carbs (sans
>> avocado).
>>
>> That said, within one's daily allowance of carbs, fruits are
>> permitted. I feel that vegetables give more bang for the buck than
>> fruits anyway, and eat about one apple per day only as far as fruits
>> are concerned.
>>
>> I personally think that there is a lot of truth in raw foodism, which
>> is saying that raw foods are great foods. The logical fallacy that
>> they make is saying that they want to ONLY eat raw foods, instead of
>> correctly saying that they should eat a lot of raw foods.
>>
>> So, a great majority of what I eat is raw, sans for meat and
>> such. Tried to eat raw meat also, but it is not very practicable due
>> to spoliation/contamination issues.
>>
>> i
>
> Veges are way better than fruits in my opinion -- less carbs and higher
> fiber typically. I do tend toward the berries though, and eat some type
> of berry almost every day. My typical day includes a large salad,
> tomatoes, onions, cooked tomatoes (salsa), and berries. Also, I eat nuts
> almost every day.
>

I could have repeated what you said, word for word.

Fruits are basically a lot of sugar with some fiber and vitamins. Vegs
are basically a little bit of sugar with fiber and vitamins. Better
than fruits.

i